Viewpoint: European HVO demand to rise in 2025

Market: Biofuels
23/12/24

European demand for hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), or renewable diesel, will be supported in 2025 by a combination of higher mandates for the use of renewables in transport, and by changes to EU member state regulations on the carryover of renewable fuels tickets, like in Germany and the Netherlands.

European HVO production could grow by more than 400,000t in 2025, if announced projects are completed in time. Most new plants have the flexibility to switch to sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production, in the form of hydrotreated esters and fatty acids synthesised paraffinic kerosene (HEFA-SPK).

But those seeking to import HVO into the EU will face barriers. Definitive EU anti-dumping duties (ADDs) on Chinese biodiesel and HVO will be imposed by mid-February, and anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties are already in place for HVO and biodiesel of US and Canadian origin.

Flows of US-origin HVO to the UK are unimpeded as transposed EU duties were removed in 2022.

A clean slate...

Against a headwind of gradually shrinking diesel demand, national transport renewables mandates are increasing. These ambitions rise again under the next iteration of the EU's Renewable Energy Directive (RED III), for which member states face a May 2025 transposition deadline.

Optimism in the biofuels markets will be tempered by experiences in 2024. The low value of renewable fuel tickets — tradeable credits generated primarily by the sale of biofuel-blended fuels — in major European demand centres has weighed on supplier appetite for physical biofuels.

This includes the relatively expensive HVO that can be blended in much greater volumes than cheaper fatty acid methyl esters (Fame). A portion of these tradeable tickets can usually be carried over from one obligation year to the next — as was done from 2023-24 — extending pressure on physical biofuel demand.

But Germany has approved a law removing the option for companies to carry over excess 2024 greenhouse gas (GHG) certificates through both 2025 and 2026, aimed at resetting the outlook for physical renewables demand. Obligated parties will need start from scratch to meet their annual GHG savings targets — at 10.6pc for 2025 and 12.1pc for 2026 — resulting in greater demand for physical biofuels including HVO.

In the Netherlands, the tickets carryover will be reduced from 25pc to 10pc for companies with an annual blending obligation.

...follows volatility

Prompt HVO assessments firmed significantly late in 2024 — albeit from long-term lows — driven by short-term demand in the Netherlands at a time of tight regional supply.

HVO (Class II) fob ARA range, a European benchmark based on HVO produced from used cooking oil (UCO), peaked at $1,500/m³ as a premium to escalated gasoil by 14 November — or a 122pc increase from the start of October — equating to $2,652.91/t on an outright basis.

Assessments then fell back to a $860/m³ premium a week later, when the market rebalanced as suppliers looked to reroute prompt volumes.

Before the rise, prices had hovered around historically soft levels for a sustained period. Sweden's decision to slash its GHG emissions mandate for the 2024-26 period due to fuel price concerns, and the low ticket prices have kept a lid on values.

The HVO (Class II) outright price averaged around $1,625/t over 1 January-31 October 2024, down by around $580/t compared with the same period of 2023.

While fundamentals now point to growth in European HVO use, the futures curve is backwardated. Those in the market may yet take a position that aligns with this viewpoint, but recent volatility has stunted forward trade.

By Toby Shay

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

06/06/25

Jones Act rates unaffected by Trump ship talk

New York, 6 June (Argus) — Freight rates for the Jones Act fleet of US-built and crewed vessels that transport oil and other liquids between US ports have responded little to US government shakeups in 2025. The rate for a Houston, Texas-Port Everglades, Florida voyage on a Jones Act medium range (MR) tanker dropped by 8¢/bl to $3.29/bl between 3 January and 30 May per Argus assessments, down by only 2.3pc in that time despite US president Donald Trump's February announcement to bolster US shipbuilding . Trump has expressed a desire to boost US shipbuilding, while shorter-term remedies to an aging US-flagged fleet could come in the form of converting foreign-flagged vessels rather than building new ships domestically . The cost to build an MR tanker at a US shipyard is about $210mn,compared with $50mn to build the same vessel in South Korea, according to Macquarie Bank. Vessels re-flagged in the US are eligible for US government contracts, such as Military Sealift Command loadings, alongside other support programs extended by the US to vessels flying its flag. But they do not meet all the requirements to join the Jones Act fleet shipping between US ports, specifically the US-built requirement. A lack of newbuilding activity has helped keep $/d rates elevated for the less than 50 Jones Act MR tankers that are typically under multi-year time charter contracts. Jones Act $/d rates have remained rangebound since the start of the year between $86,000/d and $91,000/d per Argus assessments, an order of magnitude higher than the $8,952/d averaged by internationally flagged MR tankers carrying refined products like diesel from the US Gulf coast to Pozos, Colombia in the same period. Most of the downward pressure on Jones Act rates in 2025 likely came from declining crude prices amid roiling market uncertainty surrounding on-again and off-again US tariffs. The response from shippers involved with the Jones Act fleet has been "more skepticism rather than optimism" and there had not been "any serious reaction by the market to the administrative initiatives", according to a Jones Act shipowner. "There has been a push to ease the re-flagging of foreign built vessels into the US flag fleet, but of course these will not be Jones Act vessels and their introduction to US flag does not benefit the domestic shipyards which is the co-ultimate target, that and labor," the contact told Argus . "The shortage of US mariners is, of course, another important issue as well that will have to be wrestled with." By Ross Griffith Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Biofuels investment to rise 13pc in 2025: IEA

05/06/25

News

05/06/25

Biofuels investment to rise 13pc in 2025: IEA

London, 5 June (Argus) — Global investment in biofuels is set to grow by 13pc in 2025 to more than $16bn, as part of a broader surge in low-emissions fuel spending, according to the IEA. The IEA's World Energy Investment report projects a 30pc year-on-year increase in total investment in low-emissions fuels — including biofuels, biogases and low-emissions hydrogen — reaching nearly $25bn this year. This follows a 20pc rise in 2024. But regional trends diverge. Europe leads in overall spending but is prioritising biogas over liquid biofuels such as biodiesel, ethanol and biogenic sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). The region accounted for 60pc of global biogas investment last year but lagged behind the US, China and Brazil in liquid biofuels. The US and Brazil dominate biodiesel and ethanol investment. Their spending is several times higher than in Europe. Brazil's role is expected to expand further following its Fuels of the Future bill, which was signed into law last year . The US is also driving growth in hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) and SAF. It accounts for half of the 40pc projected increase in HVO and SAF output this year, which the IEA expects to reach 800,000 b/d. In 2024, the US made up 70pc of global SAF investment. The IEA forecasts fossil fuel investment will decline in 2025 for the first time since 2020. This will lift the share of low-emissions fuels — including biofuels — in global energy investment, although they will still account for only around 3pc of the total. By Simone Burgin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Alcohol-to-jet stuck on runway as US policy shifts

04/06/25

News

04/06/25

Alcohol-to-jet stuck on runway as US policy shifts

New York, 4 June (Argus) — Proposed changes to a US clean fuel tax credit may be a boon for farmers, but a future where ethanol is a major ingredient in jet fuel remains far off. The massive Republican budget bill currently advancing through Congress would extend the "45Z" credit, which offers larger subsidies to fuels as they produce fewer emissions. The proposal too would bar regulators from weighing indirect land use impacts , effectively upping subsidies for crop-based fuels like ethanol, in a win for agribusiness. Farm groups have hoped that such changes could open the growing sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) market to ethanol producers, otherwise at risk from an increasingly efficient and electric US vehicle fleet. Airlines too are eager for more diverse SAF sources since the main pathway nowadays, processing vegetable oils and animal fats, draws from more limited feedstocks. United Airlines government affairs director Tom Michels said at an OurEnergyPolicy forum earlier this year that the company hopes ethanol-based fuel "could fulfill around a quarter of our future SAF needs." But incentives in law and under the proposal, which passed the House last month, would do little to boost "alcohol-to-jet" output. While ethanol typically trades at a discount to gasoline, SAF is substantially more expensive than petroleum, making government support essential for uptake. The Republican caucus has a range of views, with clean energy advocates wary of phasing out subsidies, farm-state representatives intent on boosting biofuels, and conservatives committed to curbing government spending. Republicans plan to use a process called reconciliation that allows them to pass the bill without Democratic support. How policymakers implement 45Z will be crucial for a wave of alcohol-to-jet startups eyeing production this decade. That includes Gevo, whose plans for an integrated 60mn USG/yr plant in South Dakota are complicated by another company's struggles starting an interstate carbon pipeline. Meanwhile, people familiar with the matter say that LanzaJet's 10mn USG/yr alcohol-to-jet pilot project in Georgia — which opened last year but is not yet fully operational — is not currently producing any SAF. "The suite of policies we would need to make ethanol-to-jet pencil out just does not exist right now," said Brian Jennings, chief executive of the American Coalition for Ethanol. RINs wear thin Ethanol-based SAF would likely still produce too many emissions to claim any 45Z subsidy even if the proposed emissions tracking changes took effect — since the pathway requires more energy-intensive processing to make fuel suitable for jet engines. Carbon capture could make up the difference, though few facilities have that capability. The lack of subsidy would compound barriers from the Renewable Fuel Standard, which requires oil refiners to blend biofuels or buy credits from those who do. Under the program, blending corn ethanol earns a Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credit, but there is no certified pathway yet to offer RINs for corn-based SAF blending. Even if there were, advanced biofuel credits have traded recently at only a slight premium, reducing the incentive for ethanol producers to eye new markets. Argus last assessed current year D4 biomass-based diesel credits at 92.25¢/RIN and D6 conventional credits at 86.50¢/RIN, and they traded at parity much of last year. Meanwhile, the typical US dry mill ethanol producer would likely qualify for some 45Z subsidy if the Republican bill passed, adding to RIN benefits. Those plants would have to forgo both incentives to sell to SAF makers. It is unclear how producers of a more-expensive and less-subsidized SAF could compete on price. Gevo chief executive Patrick Gruber said that his company's integrated model — producing ethanol and SAF at the same sites — is less risky than buying ethanol from elsewhere. But there are other policy headwinds. A new South Dakota law to restrict eminent domain could derail Summit Carbon's planned multistate carbon pipeline, which dozens of biorefineries, including one Gevo facility, want to join. Gevo has purchased a North Dakota biorefinery that can already capture carbon on site, a potentially lucrative workaround to pipeline delays, and is eyeing SAF production there too. There is a RIN pathway for SAF from Brazilian sugarcane ethanol — a model that LanzaJet has pursued — but credit pricing makes economics challenging there too, adding to freight and tariff costs . Even then, the bill to change 45Z would restrict eligibility to North American feedstocks, upending LanzaJet's plans for Brazilian ethanol without making US alternatives more economical. "45Z as currently drafted creates a disincentive for US ethanol to be used in SAF," said LanzaJet vice president of government and regulatory affairs Angela Foster-Rice. "We are hopeful to get this issue addressed in the Senate bill." Despite policy uncertainty, airlines have committed to procuring far more SAF and might be willing to pay a premium. But they are more likely to pay up for fuel they can at least use for SAF mandates in the EU and UK, which do not credit fuels from first-generation crops. US federal and state programs subsidize lower-carbon jet fuels but do not mandate usage. The floor is yours The Republican bill is still just a proposal, leaving the possibility for changes. The Senate reconvened this week with a goal of passing the bill before 4 July, and members have signaled they might take a different approach to clean energy subsidies than the House. Some biofuel lobbyists support shifting rules to benefit SAF — potentially by providing a higher "floor" credit for refiners that barely qualify or allowing alcohol-to-jet producers to claim the same benefit as upstream ethanol refiners. Under current rules, fuels may earn just cents per gallon. But such changes could rile trucking groups frustrated with 45Z already offering heftier subsidies to SAF and deficit hawks worried about the bill's mounting costs. By Cole Martin and Matthew Cope Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

India lowers edible oil import duties to 10pc

02/06/25

News

02/06/25

India lowers edible oil import duties to 10pc

Singapore, 2 June (Argus) — India has lowered import duties on crude edible oils by 10pc effective from 31 May, according to a statement published on the ministry of finance website on 30 May. Customs duties applied to crude palm, crude soybean, and crude sunflower oils were reduced to 10pc from an earlier 20pc. These oils now face effective import duties of 16.5pc compared to 27.5pc previously, including a separate agriculture infrastructure and development cess and a social welfare cess. But import duties for refined versions of the oils were unchanged at 32.5pc. The total effective import tax rate on refined palm, soybean, and sunflower oils remains at 35.75pc. Keeping duties on imported refined oils unchanged is expected to provide relief to the domestic refining industry because it will likely raise the rate of vegetable oil refining in the country, according to Anilkumar Bagani, commodity research head of Indian vegetable oil brokerage Sunvin Group. The move is likely to drive an increase in crude vegetable oil imports, displacing imports of refined oils, Bagani said. This could lower end product vegetable oil prices in India in the short term. But the increase in Indian demand could also cause crude vegetable oil prices to move higher at their respective origins, which could counteract the government's initial objective of lowering prices for the end consumer, he added. By Malcolm Goh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Ammonia ships best placed for IMO rules: Study

30/05/25

News

30/05/25

Ammonia ships best placed for IMO rules: Study

Sao Paulo, 30 May (Argus) — Ammonia dual-fuel ships will be best positioned to meet the International Maritime Organisation's (IMO) Net-Zero Framework from 2028 onwards, according to a study by University College London (UCL) and maritime consultancy UMAS. The study says LNG-fuelled ships will benefit from the IMO's rules in the short term, but they will no longer comply after 2030 unless operators switch to bio-LNG or install onboard carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems. Without CCS, they will not generate enough surplus units (SUs) to offset emissions. Uncertainty around future LNG prices and abatement costs could also limit its appeal as a long-term bunker fuel, the study said. In contrast, blue ammonia ships will remain compliant until the mid-2040s. After that, vessels would need to switch to e-ammonia to avoid buying remedial units. Methanol dual-fuel ships would need to transition from biomethanol to biodiesel by 2034, and to e-methanol by 2038 to stay within IMO limits. Fuel choice will be shaped by abatement and penalty costs until the mid-2030s, but emissions intensity will become the main driver after that, the study said. UCL and UMAS used total cost of operation modelling to compare LNG, methanol, ammonia and conventional bunker fuels. The model also factored in potential gains from SUs discussed at the IMO's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 83), although final SU values may still change. On the port side, the study said infrastructure investment will follow shipowner demand. In the near term, ports should support at least three bunker fuels, but in the medium term, they should focus on ammonia. By Gabriel Tassi Lara and Natalia Coelho Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more