Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

IMO approves two-tier GHG pricing mechanism

  • Market: Biofuels, Hydrogen, Natural gas, Oil products
  • 11/04/25

Delegates have approved the global greenhouse gas (GHG) pricing mechanism proposal at the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) 83rd Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) meeting, pending an adoption vote at the next MEPC in October.

The proposal passed by a majority vote, with 63 nations in favor including EU states, the UK, China and India, and 16 members opposed, including Mideast Gulf states, Russia, and Venezuela. The US was absent from the MEPC 83 meeting, and 24 member states abstained.

The proposal was accompanied by an amendment to implement the regulation, which was approved for circulation ahead of an anticipated adoption at the October MEPC.

Approval was not unanimous, which is rare. If adoption is approved in October at a vote that will require a two-thirds majority, the maritime industry will become the first transport sector to implement internationally mandated targets to reduce GHG emissions.

The text says ships must initially reduce their fuel intensity by a "base target" of 4pc in 2028 (see table) against 93.3 gCO2e/MJ, the latter representing the average GHG fuel intensity value of international shipping in 2008. This gradually tightens to 30pc by 2035. The text defines a "direct compliance target", that starts at 17pc for 2028 and grows to 43pc by 2035.

The pricing mechanism establishes a levy for excessive emissions at $380 per tonne of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) for ships compliant with the minimum 'base' target, called Tier 2. For ships in Tier 1 — those compliant with the base target but that still have emission levels higher than the direct compliance target — the price was set at $100/tCO2e.

Over-compliant vessels will receive 'surplus units' equal to their positive compliance balance, expressed in tCO2e, valid for two years after emission. Ships then will be able to use the surplus units in the following reporting periods; transfer to other vessels as a credit; or voluntarily cancel as a mitigation contribution.

IMO secretary general Arsenio Dominguez said while it would have been more preferable to have a unanimous outcome, this outcome is a good result nonetheless.

"We work on consensus, not unanimity," he said. "We demonstrated that we will continue to work as an organization despite the concerns."

Looking at the MEPC session in October, Dominguez said: "Different member states have different positions, and there is time for us to remain in the process and address those concerns, including those that were against and those that were expecting more."

Dominguez said the regulation is set to come into force in 2027, with first revenues collected in 2028 of an estimated $11bn-13bn. Dominguez also said there is a clause within the regulation that ensures a review at least every five years.

IMO GHG reduction targets
YearBase TargetDirect Compliance Target
20284%17%
20296%19%
20308%21%
203112%25%
203217%30%
203321%34%
203426%39%
203530%43%

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
12/06/25

Ice gasoil backwardation widens as supply tightens

Ice gasoil backwardation widens as supply tightens

London, 12 June (Argus) — The premium of front-month Ice gasoil futures against the second-month futures has widened over the past two weeks, reflecting tighter supply. The premium of Ice June futures against the July contract settled at $9.50/t on Wednesday, 11 June. The backwardation — where prompt prices are greater than forward prices — has steepened in the past two weeks, peaking at a premium of $16/t on Tuesday, 10 June, the joint-widest in 14 months along with 11 March. Two weeks ago, on 23 May, the premium settled at $6.50/t. The June contract expires today, which could have contributed to the steepening backwardation as traders close their open positions, according to market participants. But the size of the premium suggests a tightening market. A closed arbitrage from the Mideast Gulf and India since April has reduced supply to Europe, European traders have said. Only 2.97mn t of diesel and other gasoil has arrived in Europe from the Mideast Gulf and India in April and May, according to ship-tracking service Vortexa, compared with about 5.72mn t in the same period last year. The arbitrage has been closed because of relative weakness in European prices compared with those in Singapore. The premium of front-month Ice gasoil futures against Singaporean equivalents averaged $18.65/t in May, compared with $23.81/t in May 2024. Singaporean middle distillate stocks fell to a nine-month low in the week ending 23 April, increasing demand for imports. European diesel values fell sharply at the start of April in response to the implementation of US tariffs, largely because of dampened expectations of industrial performance, and have not recovered. The start of the Mediterranean emissions control area (ECA) at the start of May has also placed strain on European supply of diesel and other gasoil. The ECA requires ships in the Mediterranean to use fuel with a sulphur content of 0.1pc, rather than the previous requirement of 0.5pc. Marine gasoil (MGO) fits the new requirement, as does ultra-low sulphur fuel oil (ULSFO). With supply of the latter limited in Europe, the majority of shipowners have switched to MGO. Refineries have probably increased MGO production to meet this new demand, but MGO supply is still "very tight" , a Mediterranean-based marine fuels trader said. Most of the gasoil used for blending in MGO is suitable for desulphurisation and use as road fuel, and so it diversion into marine fuels restricts supply of diesel. Independently-held inventories of diesel and other gasoil at the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) hub have dropped since the start of April. The four-week average came to about 2.1mn t on 5 June, lower on the year by 8.5pc, according to consultancy Insights Global. On 3 April the four-week average was 5.1pc higher than a year earlier. A recovery in Rhine river water levels in recent weeks , after lows that restricted barge movement inland from ARA, contributed to the stockdraw. By Josh Michalowski Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Malaysia’s oil, gas projects to emit 4bn t GHG: CREA


12/06/25
News
12/06/25

Malaysia’s oil, gas projects to emit 4bn t GHG: CREA

Singapore, 12 June (Argus) — Malaysia's continued extraction and use of its oil and gas resources could emit around 4bn t of greenhouse gases (GHGs), according to a report by the Helsinki-based Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA). Malaysia holds about 9.84bn bl of oil equivalent (boe) in committed fossil fuel reserves, of which 82pc is gas, stated the report, which was written in collaboration with environmental think-tank RimbaWatch. This figure only includes projects with proven reserves that are covered by a production commitment such as production sharing contracts. These committed reserves would also emit an estimated 4.15bn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e), which is equivalent to 13 years of Malaysia's annual emissions. The emissions will also consist of 10.9mn t of methane, which is a much more potent GHG than CO2. Malaysia's remaining commercially recoverable reserves are estimated at over 17bn boe over more than 400 fields, with gas comprising about 75pc of this. Malaysia launched its national energy transition roadmap (NETR) in 2023, detailing initiatives to achieve its 2050 net zero carbon emissions target, such as renewable energy development, hydrogen and carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS). The country aims to reduce its economy-wide carbon emissions by 45pc in 2030 compared with 2005 levels, under its nationally determined contribution — climate plan — to meet the goal of the Paris Agreement. But at the same time, the country is seeking to maximise its fossil fuel production to ensure energy security. State-owned Petronas raised its total oil and gas production in 2024 to 2.4mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d), up by 1pc on the year. Of this, oil production fell by 4.4pc on the year to 813,000 boe/d, while gas output rose by 3.6pc to 1.64mn boe/d. More than 80pc of Malaysia's power was generated from fossil fuels in 2024. The NETR plans to increase the share of gas in total primary energy supply by 16pc from 2023 to 57pc in 2050, with gas viewed as a transition fuel for decarbonisation. But "referring to gas as sustainable, and claiming that Malaysia can achieve net-zero emissions through growing gas, are oxymorons," stated the report. Petronas' Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions totalled 46.04mn t of CO2e across its Malaysian operations in 2024, surpassing its target of 49.5mn t of CO2e for the year. In comparison, the firm recorded 45.6mn t of Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions in 2023. But the firm's net zero pathway excludes its Scope 3 emissions, which make up about 80pc of a fossil fuel entity's emissions, according to the report. Additionally, its CCUS plans are aimed at enabling sour gas extraction, hence exacerbating fossil fuel production and emissions. Malaysia should instead set a sectoral carbon budget for the domestic energy sector in line with its net zero goals, taking into account both production and consumption, and cement this budget in the country's upcoming Climate Change bill, stated the report. By Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Japan’s Jera signs LNG supply agreements with the US


12/06/25
News
12/06/25

Japan’s Jera signs LNG supply agreements with the US

Singapore, 12 June (Argus) — Japanese power producer Jera has signed multiple long-term LNG supply agreements with US partners over the past two months, to procure up to 5.5mn t/yr of LNG supply from the US over 20 years, the firm announced on 12 June. The agreements include a 2mn t/yr sales and purchase agreement (SPA) with US LNG firm NextDecade on 28 April, and a 1mn t/yr SPA with US developer Commonwealth LNG on 30 May. Jera has also signed non-binding interim agreements with Sempra Infrastructure — a subsidiary of US energy firm Sempra — for 1.5mn t/yr on 29 May, and with developer Cheniere for 1mn t/yr on 11 June. The deals offer competitive pricing and flexible contract terms. All supply will be delivered on a fob basis priced to the US' Henry Hub, allowing Jera to optimise shipping routes and respond flexibly to domestic demand and market conditions, the company said. If the four deals are considered as a single package of 5.5mn t/yr of supply, it is Jera's largest contract to date, senior managing executive officer Ryosuke Tsugaru said. The new agreements add to Jera's existing offtake contracts with the US, which include a combined 3.5mn t/yr of LNG from Texas' Freeport LNG and Louisiana's Cameron LNG, and approximately 1mn t/yr of LNG from developer Venture Global's CP2 project in Louisiana. US supplies could account for 30pc of Jera's long-term LNG portfolio in 2035, up from 10pc at present, a Jera spokesman told Argus . But Jera does not intend to increase its planned LNG handling volume of no less than 35mn t/yr up to the April 2035-March 2036 fiscal year, as some of its existing contracts are set expired in the middle of the 2030-31 fiscal year, Tsugaru said. The potential increase in Japan's US LNG procurement should help reduce the US' trade deficit with Japan, which could aid Tokyo's negotiations over import tariffs with the US administration. But Jera emphasised that neither Tokyo or Washington had requested or pressured it to sign the new supply contracts. The deals were Jera's decision to ensure stable supplies to Japan, Jera said. The Japanese government could use the US' proposed 20mn t/yr Alaska LNG export project as part of its tariff negotiations, as Alaska's proximity to Japan and its ample resources make it a promising import source for the east Asian country. Jera is waiting for more details to be announced about the project before it makes a decision on whether to step into an offtake deal, Tsugaru said. Jera dose not plan to invest in the development of the project, he added. Japan's LNG imports from the US rose by 15pc on the year to 6.34mn t in 2024. By Motoko Hasegawa and Joey Chan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EQT signs 10-year gas deals with Duke, Southern


11/06/25
News
11/06/25

EQT signs 10-year gas deals with Duke, Southern

New York, 11 June (Argus) — US natural gas producer EQT has signed 10-year firm supply deals with US utilities Duke Energy and Southern Company for a combined 1.2 Bcf/d of gas beginning in 2027. EQT previously disclosed it struck deals to sell 800mn cf/d and 400mn cf/d of gas to "investment-grade utilities" in the southeastern US, but it has not disclosed the buyers. Those previously unnamed utilities are North Carolina-based Duke, which has contracted for 800mn cf/d from EQT, and Georgia-based Southern, which has contracted for 400mn cf/d, according to people with knowledge of the matter. EQT declined to comment for this story. Duke and Southern did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The deals represent about 20pc of EQT's production and allow EQT to take advantage of contracted capacity it holds on Mountain Valley Pipeline, which ferries gas from West Virginia to Virginia. EQT, the second-largest US gas producer by volume, has been the owner of Mountain Valley Pipeline since acquiring its previous owner Equitrans Midstream in July 2024. The gas supply deals are "two of the largest long-term physical supply deals ever executed in the North American natural gas market," EQT chief executive Toby Rice said in October 2023. The deals also underpin EQT's broader strategy of trying to sell more gas directly to large end users, including utilities, LNG export terminals and data centers, instead of selling into the volatile US spot gas market with the use of financial hedges. The deals also give EQT more exposure to pricing hubs in the southeastern US, where gas trades at a premium to gas sold within the Appalachian production region, where EQT operates. For Duke and Southern, the long-term agreements guarantee available gas supply as the utilities convert coal-fired power generation facilities to gas-fired generators while scrambling to meet surging power demand from planned data centers running artificial intelligence software. Those drivers of gas demand are also behind US pipeline companies Williams, Kinder Morgan and Boardwalk Pipeline Partners trying to build out more gas transportation capacity into the southeast, FactSet manager of natural gas research Connor McLean told Argus . Duke Energy plans to add 5GW of new gas-fired power generation through 2029 across its territory, the company said earlier this month. Duke Energy Carolinas and Southern Company hold most of the contracted capacity on Williams' planned 1.6 Bcf/d Southeast Supply Enhancement expansion of its Transcontinental (Transco) pipeline, which is expected to enter service in the fourth quarter of 2027, US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission filings show. That expansion project will make available new gas transportation capacity from the terminus of the Mountain Valley Pipeline in Virginia to end markets in Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Alabama. Duke Energy Carolinas, whose service territory includes North Carolina and South Carolina, holds 1 Bcf/d of contracted capacity on Southeast Supply Enhancement. Southern Company, whose service territory includes Georgia and Alabama, holds 400mn cf/d. By selling into those regions, EQT will be taking 1.2 Bcf/d of gas it was previously selling into the comparatively low-priced Tetco M-2 market and selling it instead into the higher priced Transco zone 4 and 5 South markets. The spot price for gas in the Transco zone 5 South region — which covers gas downstream from compressor station 165 near the terminus of Mountain Valley Pipeline in Virginia to the Georgia-South Carolina border — in 2024 averaged $2.69/mmBtu, and the Transco zone 4 index — spanning Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi — averaged $2.41/mmBtu. The Tetco M-2 receipts index over the period averaged $1.67/mmBtu. The supply deals with Duke and Southern are "the main driver" behind EQT's anticipated corporate gas price differential — or the average price at which it sells its gas relative to the US benchmark price — tightening to around 30¢/mmBtu in 2028 from an anticipated 60¢/mmBtu this year, EQT's Rice said in April. EQT is also in talks with a dozen proposed power projects in the Appalachian production region, he said. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump brings momentum and uncertainty to US LNG


11/06/25
News
11/06/25

Trump brings momentum and uncertainty to US LNG

The current administration has been quick to roll out export licences, but the steel tariffs might throw a wrench in its plans, writes Tray Swanson London, 11 June (Argus) — US president Donald Trump's administration has swiftly shored up the country's LNG industry, most prominently by doling out export licences to proposed terminals. But while cutting regulatory hurdles signals policy stability and helps projects on the cusp of final investment decisions (FIDs) gain momentum in commercial negotiations, Trump's unwavering commitment to steel tariffs adds a layer of uncertainty for developers looking to spend billions on new projects. Political backing from the new administration and regulatory streamlining helped bring momentum to commercial talks. Since January, US LNG producers have signed or finalised offtake agreements totalling 10.7mn t/yr, including non-binding deals.Five LNG projects received a non-free trade agreement (FTA) permit or permit extension since January, which could make their projects more appealing in commercial talks with banks and potential offtakers. Four of them expect to reach FIDs this year. In February, Trump's Department of Energy (DOE) swiftly ended the Biden administration's year-long pause on issuing licences to export to non-FTA countries. Although the first two new licences were conditional, the DOE issued a final order for Sempra's 13.5mn t/yr Port Arthur phase 2 project on 29 May, shortly after the DOE concluded its 2024 LNG export study that was commissioned by the Biden administration to assess the impact of increased LNG exports on "the public interest". Trump's DOE found that higher exports indeed are in the public interest and hailed "a return to regular order on LNG exports". Alongside Port Arthur, Kimmeridge's 9.5mn t/yr Commonwealth LNG, Delfin's 13.2mn t/yr floating LNG terminal and Venture Global's 28mn t/yr CP2 plant have also received export approvals or extensions and are anticipated to reach FID later this year. Several other legislative measures being discussed in the Republican-dominated Congress seek to eliminate regulatory delays to LNG projects. The so-called "big, beautiful bill" includes an add-on that would automatically grant non-FTA export licences to developers that pay a $1mn fee, considering the payment to be in the public interest. One bill proposed in the Senate seeks to prevent federal courts from vacating permits that are already issued to LNG facilities, a measure that would safeguard projects from the judicial setbacks that NextDecade's Rio Grande LNG and Glenfarne's Texas LNG faced last year. And the House Energy Subcommittee on Energy will soon discuss the 1948 bill, which would eliminate altogether the requirement for DOE authorisation to export LNG, placing sole authority over LNG approvals with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Steely determination But not all of Trump's policies have found a receptive audience in the LNG sector. His insistence on levying tariffs on steel and aluminium, key building materials for LNG projects, might force companies to adjust their spending plans. Unlike the reciprocal tariffs placed, revoked and still threatened on most countries, Trump has not dithered on the metals tariffs since enacting them in March. Instead, he doubled steel and aluminum duties to 50pc on 4 June — a move that, barring an exemption for industry, threatens to inflate project costs. The US Trade Representative has partly back-tracked on its proposal to require 1pc of US LNG exports be loaded on US-flagged, built and operated ships from 2028 — by shifting the duty to comply from plant operators, which under the original plan faced the threat of having their export licences revoked, to shippers. This came after the industry had criticised the measure for being hard to reconcile with the prevailing fob nature of US LNG contracts. Yet it remains difficult to envisage how even the amended proposal could work in practice. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more